Missing number, treated as zero. Woran liegt das hier?

Ich will eine fett gedruckte Ableitung schreiben und mache das so:

Code, hier editierbar zum Übersetzen:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{ngerman}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{bm}
\begin{document}
$\bm{\dot{x}}$
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Jedoch erhalte ich einen Fehler:

Open in writeLaTeX

1
2
3
4
5
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again> 
                   \errhelp 
l.5 $\bm{\dot{x}}
                 $
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Woran liegt das?

gefragt 25 Jan '14, 19:01

Student
590●77●79●104
Akzeptiert-Rate: 82%

bearbeitet 25 Jan '14, 19:05

cgnieder
22.1k●25●34●63

Eine Antwort:

active answers älteste Antworten neueste Antworten Beliebteste Antworten

Gefunden, es liegt am ngerman-Paket. Das ist eh veraltet und ich ersetze es besser durch babel:

Open in writeLaTeX

Code, hier editierbar zum Übersetzen:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{bm}
\begin{document}
$\bm{\dot{x}}$
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Ansonsten habe ich festgestellt, dass zusätzliches Klammern auch geholfen hätte:

Open in writeLaTeX

Code, hier editierbar zum Übersetzen:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{ngerman}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{bm}
\begin{document}
$\bm{{\dot{x}}}$
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Aber wie gesagt, man sollte wirklich babel mit ngerman-Option statt ngerman verwenden.

Permanenter link

beantwortet 25 Jan '14, 19:12

Student
590●77●79●104
Akzeptiert-Rate: 82%

Deine Antwort

[Vorschau ausblenden]

Community Wiki:

Folgen dieser Frage

Per E-Mail:

Wenn sie sich anmelden, kommen Sie für alle Updates hier in Frage

Per RSS:

Antworten

Antworten und Kommentare

Frage-Themen:

schriften ×78
mathe-modus ×77
amsmath ×38
fett ×3

gestellte Frage: 25 Jan '14, 19:01

Frage wurde gesehen: 25,851 Mal

zuletzt geändert: 25 Jan '14, 19:12

Missing number, treated as zero. Woran liegt das hier?

Folgen dieser Frage

verwandte Fragen