Hallo TeXwelt

hab da ein kleines Problem ähnlich zu dem was ich schon mal in TeXwelt gepostet hab. Siehe da: http://texwelt.de/wissen/fragen/12997/biblatex-nur-erst-author-mit-et-al-im-text

Ich habe zwei Zitate wo jeweils der Erst- und Zweitautor gleich sind und der Drittautor beim zweiten Zitat auch noch als weitere Autor auftaucht. Beide Zitate stammen aus 2006

Momentan hab ich:

bla Thomas, Webster & Davidson (2006) bla Thomas, Webster, Rhede, et al. (2006) bla Veksler & Thomas (2002) bla

Es sollte (in Kapitälchen) da stehen:

bla Thomas et. al (2006a) bla Thomas et al. (2006b) bla Veksler & Thomas (2002)

Wo liegt mein Fehler?

Danke

Hier ein Beispiel

Open in Online-Editor
Code, hier editierbar zum Übersetzen:
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,oneside]{report}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ngerman,english]{babel}
\usepackage[
backend=biber,
natbib=true,
sorting=nyt,
useauthor=true,
uniquelist=minyear,
uniquename=false,
style=authoryear,
maxbibnames=25,
minbibnames=25
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\ExecuteBibliographyOptions{maxcitenames=2,mincitenames=1}
\renewcommand*{\mkbibnamelast}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
\renewcommand{\finalnamedelim}{ \& }
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@Article{Thomasetal2006b,
Title = {Title},
Author = {Thomas, R. and Webster, J.D. and Rhede, D. and Siefert, W. and Förster, H.J. and Heinrich, W. and Davidson, P.},
Journal = {L},
Year = {2006},
Number = {1--4},
Pages = {137--149},
Volume = {91},
Owner = {Unidentified},
Timestamp = {2015.04.27}
}
@InCollection{Thomasetal2006a,
Title = {Title 2},
Author = {Thomas, R. and Webster, J.D. and Davidson, P.},
Booktitle = {a book},
Publisher = {a publisher},
Year = {2006},
Editor = {Webster, J.D.},
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dieser Frage ist "Community Wiki" markiert.

gefragt 12 Jul '15, 18:17

Steineklopfer's gravatar image

Steineklopfer
1265813
Akzeptiert-Rate: 0%

bearbeitet 13 Jul '15, 12:08

saputello's gravatar image

saputello
11.1k174365


Du erhältst das gewünschte, wenn Du nach Auswahl des Stils uniquelist=false setzt. Das hält übrigens auch Deine Anforderungen aus der verlinkten Frage ein:

alt text

Open in Online-Editor
Code, hier editierbar zum Übersetzen:
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,oneside]{report}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ngerman,english]{babel}
\usepackage[
backend = biber,
bibencoding = auto,
natbib = true,
sorting = nyt,
sortlocale = auto,
useauthor = true,
% uniquelist = minyear,
% uniquename = false,
style = authoryear,
uniquelist = false,
maxbibnames = 25,
minbibnames = 25,
maxcitenames = 2,
mincitenames = 1
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\ExecuteBibliographyOptions{maxcitenames=2,mincitenames=1}
\renewcommand*{\mkbibnamelast}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
\renewcommand{\finalnamedelim}{ \& }
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib}
@Article{Thomasetal2006b,
Title = {Title},
Author = {Thomas, R. and Webster, J.D. and Rhede, D. and Siefert, W. and Förster, H.J. and Heinrich, W. and Davidson, P.},
Journal = {L},
Year = {2006},
Number = {1--4},
Pages = {137--149},
Volume = {91},
Owner = {Unidentified},
Timestamp = {2015.04.27}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Permanenter link

beantwortet 13 Jul '15, 12:18

cgnieder's gravatar image

cgnieder
22.1k253463
Akzeptiert-Rate: 60%

bearbeitet 13 Jul '15, 12:57

definiere für die ersten beiden in der bib:

Open in Online-Editor
author={...}
shortauthor={{Thomas et. al}},
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dann aber auch noch

Open in Online-Editor
%\renewcommand*{\mkbibnamelast}[1]{\textsc{#1}}
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

damit die Autoren in Normalschrift erscheinen.

Permanenter link

beantwortet 13 Jul '15, 10:56

Herbert's gravatar image

Herbert
5.1k34
Akzeptiert-Rate: 31%

Hallo Herbert,

vielen dank,

der Hinweis mit dem shortauthor löst das Problem, das mit dem Authoren in Kapitälchen ist so gewollt.

dank und Glück Auf!

Thomas

(13 Jul '15, 11:19) Steineklopfer

Das shortauthor-Feld ist laut Anleitung grundsätzlich aber für eine andere Verwendung gedacht: »This field is mainly intended for abbreviated forms of corporate authors, see § 2.3.3 for details.«. shortauthor zu setzen, um die Formatierung im Text zu bestimmen, scheint mir konzeptionell der falsche Weg...

(13 Jul '15, 12:59) cgnieder
Deine Antwort
[Vorschau ausblenden]

Folgen dieser Frage

Per E-Mail:

Wenn sie sich anmelden, kommen Sie für alle Updates hier in Frage

Per RSS:

Antworten

Antworten und Kommentare

Frage-Themen:

×223
×50

gestellte Frage: 12 Jul '15, 18:17

Frage wurde gesehen: 12,292 Mal

zuletzt geändert: 13 Jul '15, 12:59

Willkommen, erstes Mal hier? Schau mal unter FAQ!

×